<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>alter family law blawg &#187; All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/category/all/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Child Support and Income</title>
		<link>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/child-support-and-income.html</link>
		<comments>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/child-support-and-income.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What constitutes income in determining a child support obligation?  It may be more or less than you think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Colorado law, the amount of child support that is determined in a child support action is typically tied to the income of the parties.  The more income a party has, the greater is their share of support obligation.  But what if one of the parties does not work?  Is that party treated as having no income?  The answer is; it depends.  <span id="more-29"></span>Colorado measures one&#8217;s gross income rather than net income, and treats the definition of income fairly liberally.  See <a href="http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&#038;fn=main-h.htm&#038;cp=">C.R.S. 14-10-115 (3)(a)</a>. Income does not have to be earned such as what you would get from working.  Rather, income can come from any source such as interest on money in your account, bonuses, dividends, rents, capital gains, unemployment insurance benefits, workers&#8217; compensation benefits, disability insurance benefits, monetary gifts, lottery winnings, and alimony. See <a href="http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&#038;fn=main-h.htm&#038;cp=">C.R.S. 14-10-115(5)(a)</a>.  This list is not exhaustive, but illustrative of the kinds of things that can constitute income even if the party is not working.  </p>
<p>Further, under Colorado law, when a party is unemployed or underemployed, the court can base child support upon that party’s potential income rather than their actual income.  See <a href="http://www.michie.com/colorado/lpext.dll?f=templates&#038;fn=main-h.htm&#038;cp=">C.R.S. 14-10-115 (5)(b)(I)</a>.  This is called imputed income, and is used when the court finds that the party is shirking their child support obligation by foregoing a higher paying job. Past employment, education, physical and mental health, and efforts in looking for a better job, are just some of the factors the court can consider in determining whether to impute income on a party.  There are some exceptions to imputation however.  A Colorado court will not impute income on a party who is caring for a child of the parties and who is under 30 months of age, or who is physically or mentally incapacitated, or who has been sentenced to at least one year of prison.  As always, it is good to check with an attorney as to the application of the law to the facts of your case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/child-support-and-income.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Jurisdiction for Colorado Dissolution of Marriage</title>
		<link>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/personal-jurisdiction.html</link>
		<comments>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/personal-jurisdiction.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dissolution of Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal jurisdiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is personal jurisdiction necessary to get a dissolution of marriage in Colorado?  Generally, yes.  But the details vary.  Personal jurisdiction deals with the power of the court to enter orders as to a person or a thing.  If there is property in a geographic location where the court is sitting, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is personal jurisdiction necessary to get a dissolution of marriage in Colorado?  Generally, yes.  But the details vary.  Personal jurisdiction deals with the power of the court to enter orders as to a person or a thing.  <span id="more-20"></span>If there is property in a geographic location where the court is sitting, the court likely has personal jurisdiction over that property which is known as <em>in rem</em> jurisdiction.  Personal jurisdiction over a person is known as <em>in personam</em> jurisdiction.  What is the significance of this distinction as applied to a dissolution of marriage in Colorado?  A big one.  </p>
<p>If the Petitioner (the one who files for divorce) files a petition against the spouse but is unable to personally serve the spouse with notice of the dissolution, the court can still enter orders dissolving the marriage, disposing of the in-state property, and custody.  Why?  Because the marriage itself and the in-state property are <em>in rem</em> and the necessary personal jurisdiction can be conferred through publication as long as the court grants the motion for the publication, which generally requires a showing that due diligence has been made to first try personal service. Children involve special jurisdictional rules which allow custodial determinations without personal service under certain circumstances. So, it is possible to get a dissolution of marriage, the children, and the in-state property, without the other spouse ever knowing what happened.</p>
<p>However, personal service is required for any orders which require the spouse to do anything such as pay maintenance, child support and attorneys fees.  It is also required for any orders regarding property located out of the state.  A couple caveats: First, the spouse could waive any service by simply filing an appearance or answer, or even filing as a co-Petitioner.  Second, service on an out-of-state spouse might still not be sufficient if the spouse does not have any contacts with Colorado, such as never having a marital domicile here or never having conceived of a child here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/personal-jurisdiction.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Law Marriage</title>
		<link>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/common-law-marriage.html</link>
		<comments>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/common-law-marriage.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[common law marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people have heard the term common law marriage.  But what is it exactly? Colorado common law marriage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Colorado common law marriage.  Many people have heard the term common law marriage.  But what is it exactly?  <span id="more-12"></span>Most marriages are statutory; meaning that they are conducted in accordance with laws of the State which are codified in the State’s statutes.  In Colorado, a statutory marriage requires that the parties be at least 18 years of age, or between 16 and 18 with the consent of the parents, have a marriage license which is given upon a signed application, and within 30 days of obtaining the license, have the marriage solemnized by a person authorized to so such as a judge.  A certificate of marriage is then forwarded to the Clerk and Recorderto be registered. </p>
<p>Common law marriage in Colorado does not have the above formalities and is not recognized by any statute.  However, case law has recognized that parties can become married simply by their actions, even if they never apply for any marriage license. These actions must show that the parties mutually agreed to a marital relationship.  Now usually, the issue of a common law<br />
marriage does not come up until one of the parties wants a “divorce” and the other party disagrees that they were ever married. </p>
<p>So evidence of a mutual agreement to be married is very important to establishing that a common law marriage exists.  In Colorado, there must be conduct showing a mutual public acknowledgement of the marital relationship to establish a common law marriage.  The reason for the public display requirement is to guard against fraudulent claims of common law marriage.  Public acknowledgement of the marital relationship can be shown in part by cohabitation, but more is needed; particularly in this day and age where cohabitation is not taboo as it once was.  There must be a general understanding or reputation among persons in the community in which the couple lives that the parties hold themselves out as husband and wife. Specific behavior that may be considered includes joint bank and/or credit card accounts held in each other’s names; purchase and joint ownership<br />
of property; the use of the man&#8217;s surname by the woman (or vice versa); the use of the man&#8217;s surname by children born to the parties; and the filing of joint tax returns.  There is no specific form that this evidence must take, but rather any evidence to show that the parties openly manifested their desire to be husband and wife will suffice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alterfamilylaw.com/blawg/common-law-marriage.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
